State of Michigan

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Lansing

JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM

governor

REBECCA  A. HUMPHRIES

director

 


 

 

BILL ANALYSIS

 

BILL NUMBER:

House Bill 4203 (AS INTRODUCED)

TOPIC:

Reduced hunting fees, fishing fees, camping fees, and entry to state parks for certain disabled veterans and POWs

SPONSOR:

Representative McDowell

CO-SPONSORS:

Representatives Lahti, Sheltrown, Spade, Gonzales, Nerat, Lindberg, and Miller

COMMITTEE:

Tourism, Outdoor Recreation and Natural Resources

Analysis Done:

March 3, 2009

POSITION

The Department of Natural Resources (Department) is opposed to House Bill 4203.

PROBLEM/BACKGROUND

Currently, disabled veterans entitled to receive benefits at the 100 percent rate, who are not legally blind, may purchase hunting and fishing licenses at the discounted senior rate of 60 percent.  They do not currently receive a discount for entry to state parks or for camping in state forests or state parks.  Former prisoners of war (POW) do not receive any type of discount, unless they qualify for the disabled veteran discount.

DESCRIPTION OF BILL

The bill would amend the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (NREPA) to allow resident veterans who were permanently and totally disabled as a result of military service and entitled to veterans' benefits at the 100 percent rate, for a disability other than blindness, or a resident who has been a POW, to obtain any hunting and fishing license under Part 435 of NREPA for $1.  In addition, the Department would be required to waive the fees for entry to and camping in state parks and for state forest camping for these veterans. 

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS

Pro

Disabled veterans and former POWs have paid a high price for serving their country and should receive this small measure of compensation.

Con

Revenue would be slightly decreased by allowing selected veterans reduced fees for hunting and fishing, and free access to camping and state parks.  Most of these activities are funded exclusively with user fees and any decrease in revenue may result in less services being provided.

The Department is required to certify annually, to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the number of hunting and fishing licenses sold that resulted in net revenue greater than $1 to the Department.  This number is used in determining the amount of the federal apportionment awarded to the state under the Dingell Johnson – Pittman Robertson programs.  The $1 licenses would not be included in that number, so the federal apportionment would be reduced.

The Department may demand proof of eligibility for these reduced and free licenses and permits, but is unclear how the Department would be able to determine eligibility for on-line purchases or for making camping reservations through the Central Reservation System (CRS).

Camping in the state forests is based on the honor system with customers depositing the correct fees in an unmanned receptacle.  Verification of eligibility would become an enforcement issue, along with payment compliance of ineligible users.

FISCAL/ECONOMIC IMPACT

Are there revenue or budgetary implications in the bill to the --

(a)     Department

Budgetary:

There may be a cost to re-program the Retail Sales System (RSS) and CRS systems to accommodate these changes.

Revenue:   

A slight revenue impact would occur to the extent that qualifying disabled veterans or former POWs of war currently purchase hunting and fishing licenses, parks motor vehicle permits, or camp in state parks or state forests and pay for the privilege of participating in those activities.  Current full price hunting and fishing fees are $15 in most cases, and $6 at the senior citizen’s rate which these veterans would be eligible to pay. 

 

Parks motor vehicle permits are $24 for an annual pass, $6 for a daily pass, and camping fees primarily range from $10 to $33 per night.  The extent of the revenue impact is unknown since the number of people who would qualify for and take advantage of this benefit is unknown.

Comments:

None

(b)     State

Budgetary:

None                                                                                                             

Revenue:   

None

Comments:

None

(c)     Local Government

Comments:

None

OTHER STATE DEPARTMENTS

None

ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

None

 

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES IMPACT

Rules can be promulgated to provide for administration of the act.

 

 

_______________________________

Rebecca  A. Humphries

Director

 

_______________________________

Date

BSS